Wesley Johnston's Family History Main Page
Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to conceive.


When it comes to the Olympics, I can cheer for just about any country, since I have either ancestors or relatives on every continent (though it has been a while since my Canadian relative lived for a while in Antarctica and allowed that claim to be made). My apologies to those family members who have provided me with updated information: just about every one of these web pages could be updated. But there are so many different lines that it is impossible for me to keep up to date with every one of them. But gradually, all that I have gathered is being incorporated into these pages and my trees on Ancestry.com which are my master copies.

Contents

Beware of Ancestry.com member family trees. Click here for more information.

Canadian Ancestors


Cornish and English Ancestors


Czech Ancestors

My immigrant Czech ancestors were named Koutecky, Marek, Nevole, Subert, and Wolf. Before that I have Czech ancestors named Francé, Malypeter, Liebzeit / Librcajt, Volf, Hildman and more. All came from central Bohemia.


Dutch Ancestors: I have 6 Dutch immigrant ancestors -- two families, in which both parents and their child who was my ancestor came to Michigan -- Holland and Grand Rapids.


German Ancestors: I have 4 German immigrant ancestors and at least 2 more that I am tracing through marital relations: Hesse-Kassel, Old Schaumburg (area SW of Hannover), and Mecklenburg-Pomerania.


Scottish and Scots-Irish Ancestors

My Johnston and Gray ancestors and related Gibsons were Scots-Irish who came to Ontario County, Ontario, Canada from Northern Ireland (Ulster) in the 1840's. Due to the destruction of a great many of the public records of Ireland during the violence in 1923, I have not yet been able to trace them back from Canada to records in Ireland.

The only clue that I have is that James Gibson's 8 Sep 1870 marriage record in Pickering Township (Ontario County) gives his birthplace as Armagh, Ireland (apparently about 1839-1840). I had an exhaustive search done of all surviving Armagh registers, but no record of the family was found.

I have had Y-chromosome DNA testing done, in hopes that I might be able to link up with relatives in that way, since the paper trail is gone.

Since I have no solid documentation in Northern Ireland, I also do not know when or from where they came to Ireland from Scotland.


My Children's Mexican Ancestors

The Mexican records that I have seen are among the best in the world for genealogical research, for example baptisms giving not only the mother's maiden name but the grandparents' names, including the grandmothers' maiden names.

I was very quickly able to trace back so many lines so far that it became overwhelming in such a short time. I have a great deal in two trees on Ancestry.com but have yet to figure out the best way to present it here. So for now, here are the links to the two Ancestry.com trees for those of you who have Ancestry accounts. These families converged in Chicago in the 1940's.


Genealogical Computing Topics

I have worked with computers since 1963, retiring in 2003 from a Dow 30 company. I have been a computer programmer, a systems analyst, a database analyst, and an artificial intelligence expert -- all at industrial strength level. So I have a vast amount of experience with computing.

Relationship Searches: Blood and Non-Blood

I applied this expertise to genealogy in the earliest days of genealogical computing, writing articles for "Genealogical Computing" magazine over the years, with two in particular that focused on database search, from ideas that I first had in 1965:

I am not claiming that my articles were what the commercial products implemented. But my articles demonstrated -- at a time when such searches did not exist in commercial products -- how easily such searches could be written in a manner that ran very fast and efficiently. So I definitely raised the bar. And I am glad to say that the products took up the challenge.

Re-designing GEDCOM

I am particularly distressed by the failure of the genealogical computing community to deal with the complete re-design of the GEDCOM database format. GEDCOM is really two things in one:

  1. It is a database design.
  2. And it is a means of transferring databases, preferably without loss of information, either to another database of one's own or of someone else or to create a web page.

The second aspect really depends on the first: the design of the database is the most fundamental aspect of GEDCOM.

The reality is that the database design of GEDCOM is based on the limitations of the technology of the early 1980's -- almost 30 years ago. The resulting design sacrificed the principles of good database design (especially third normal form) in order to make things work within the limits of the technology of that time. We all did our database designs that way in those days: we had to live within the limits of the technology, or our systems would not work, no matter how perfectly their design followed good database design principles. So we de-normalized and made things work. Various commercial genealogical computing products have added features on top of the GEDCOM design, but the fundamental flaws of the underlying GEDCOM design doom any on-going add-on efforts to frustration and also violate the transferability of the information that is the second goal of GEDCOM.

But that was then and this is now. Those days and their severe technological limitations are gone. And yet we are still using essentially the GEDCOM database design that was developed for the technology of the 1980's. And we are paying for it in ways that we should no longer have to. Until there is a fundamental redesign of the GEDCOM database structure, we will continue to be unable to exploit modern technology fully for what it can do for genealogical computing, and we will continue to be unable to share our databases fully, without significant loss of information, especially of added media.

So I have put together a web page that addresses the topic in detail. Click here to see my GEDCOM redesign web page.

Fall 2011 addendum: I have begun contributing to the Better GEDCOM project, which I hope will become the independent standards body for GEDCOM and all things related to it (e.g. standardized place name hierarchies over the course of time, standardized handling of fuzzy dates, etc.). So I am no longer going to add to my own web page.


Send E-mail to wwjohnston01@yahoo.com
Copyright © 2011 by Wesley Johnston
All rights reserved


Last updated January 7, 2012
Stuck in someone's frames? Click here to break out.